rmccourt at CONDOR.DEPAUL.EDU
Wed Aug 23 15:21:51 CDT 1995
I think the Hope stuff is correct. I cite ourselves as
Homo sapiens Linnaeus et Hope, Road to Taxonomy, Warner Brothers
On Tue, 22 Aug 1995, Steve Heydon wrote:
> >>I thought C. Linnaeus was the type for Homo sapiens? (How well preserved
> >is the holotype? ...I hope Lenin isn't designated the lectotype! >:-)
> >No, Bob Hope is the designated lectotype.
> I think a few of you need to review the Code a little. A type specimen
> designated by a later author from material not in the original type series
> is called a neotype. A lectotype is a specimen selected from the original
> type series.
> Steve Heydon
More information about the Taxacom