molecular species?

Detlef Leipe leipe at CROCUS.NLM.NIH.GOV
Mon May 20 18:06:58 CDT 1996

Dear All,

I would be interested to know if the codes of nomenclature and/or
common usage requires it that the names of organism have to be
based on a morphological description.  Assuming that it allows the
unambiguous identification of a particular sequence, could a
molecular sequence, (be it as a gel, a paper hardcopy or an electronic
file) become the name bearing type?

I assume that there might be differences with respect to the acceptance of
non-morphological data between zoological/botanical nomenclature
on the one hand and bacterial nomenclature (and practice) on the other.
Would anybody be able to comment on this?

Thanks in advance

  Detlef Leipe

More information about the Taxacom mailing list