Scorpion Species

Ken Kinman kinman at HOTMAIL.COM
Sat Dec 9 22:39:15 CST 2000

      I would say that the two populations are best regarded as two
subspecies of a single biological species.
      As for the slight morphological differences and lack of any
intermediates, I guess the most likely genetic cause would be that a single
gene mutation (in a gene that manifests itself in only two states---such as
present or absent) has for some reason become homozygous recessive in one
population, but has remained a mixture in the other (heterozygous or
homozygous dominant).  Statistically the hybrids would be about 25%
phenotypically recessive and about 75% phenotypically dominant.  I suppose
there may be other possibilities, but it is very late here, and that is the
only probable solution that comes to mind.  Will think about it more
tomorrow after a good night's sleep.
                        Cheers, Ken Kinman
>From: Mark Newton <urodacus at LORDS.COM>
>Reply-To: Mark Newton <urodacus at LORDS.COM>
>Subject: Scorpion Species
>Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 11:49:56 +1030
>Hi Folks...
>Hoped you wouldn't mind if I ask another dumb question.
>This is with respect to scorpions.
>Imagine 2 species which are very nearly the same morphologically and
>ecologically fill closely the same niche. It is discovered that these
>species actually have a sympatric range where the 2 populations readily
>interbreed and produce viable offspring that are forms of either the parent
>popn's withour intermediates.
>My question is what is the most likely way to deal with this situation.
>Would they remain as separate ecological species or would they be best
>described as subspecies of the same biological  species?
>Also I'm wondering what if any genetic mechanism  may give rise to
>being the same forms as parents without intermediate forms?
>Interested to know what peoples opinions may be on this.
>Mark Newton
Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download :

More information about the Taxacom mailing list