2000 years of stasis
jrg13 at PSU.EDU
Fri Feb 4 16:51:18 CST 2000
>Tom DiBenedetto wrote
I mean, for example, read anything by Kluge in the past few
>decades for long and extended philosophical arguments about why species and
>taxa are individuals, not somehting that can be defined, but must be
>diagnosed etc. etc. How on earth can cladistics be seen as essentialistic?
I have to admit that I have not kept up with cladists discussions of
but if the "diagnosis" is spatiotemporally unrestricted then its no
a definition of essence.
>Finally, Tom Lammers writes that it is molecular biology which is really
>responsible for introducing essentialism in systematics (I find that
I would also disagree with such a view. Essentialism was well entrenched
in evolutionary biology and systematics long before molecular biology.
More information about the Taxacom