hendrik.segers at RUG.AC.BE
Thu Oct 11 09:29:47 CDT 2001
No harm done - at least the message can be understood, even with the typos.
Hope there were no typos in the Hodges numbers? ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Gatrelle" <gatrelle at TILS-TTR.ORG>
To: <TAXACOM at USOBI.ORG>
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 9:13 AM
> Do I get the record for the most typos in a paragraph yet? I see I did
> go back and do _anything_ with my first paragraph after drafting it. It
> is as.. and should be as.
> The Hodges numbers aconpanying [accompanying] his checklist start at 1 and
> continue for each species up to 11233. In other words all these numbers
> is indicate
> the cronology [chronology] of the scientific names he listed. The taxa
> listed in
> his view of their evolutionary asssent [assent]. They only cover the
> American "names" as subjectively recognized at that point in time. There
> is no code as 2000 = X genus and 3000 = Y gneus [genus]. It is just
> cornology [chronology] of occurance [occurrence] in his list. He deals
> subspecies as a,b,c under each number. So subspecies have no numbers.
> Pretty good (I mean bad), huh? 8^])
More information about the Taxacom