Cladistics and "Eclecticism"
humphries at MAIL.UTEXAS.EDU
Mon Feb 4 16:55:22 CST 2002
Ken Kinman wrote:
> Tom (and J.H.),
> First, I have to say that I am bewildered that J.H. seems to want to
> "delurk" just to imply that he thinks I fit the description of a usenet
> "troll". At least I am attempting to provide constructive criticism in my
Ken, you regularly throw out comments like:
> lineage as a whole has not gone extinct. Banging people over the head with
> statements like "birds ARE dinosaurs" just comes across as Ivory Tower
> cladistic pedantry.
I find little constructive about this, it fits to a "T" the definition
of trolling. Even your constant use of "strict cladist" seems intended to
irritate rather than inform. Strict cladists are just cladists.
And I didn't use my own words because trolling is a well known and properly
defined term (like cladistics). No need to invent a new vocabulary or
definition (and there *is* a double meaning to that sentence). Sorry if it
offends you but that's how I see many of your posts.
More information about the Taxacom