Pierre.Deleporte at UNIV-RENNES1.FR
Mon Jan 7 12:44:03 CST 2002
Dividing a character in two or more charater states is of course character
coding, but more precisely it is character state delineation (the "bete
noire" of phylogenetic inference according to Pogue and Mickevich 1990, and
as underlined by Ken for morphological data).
Once you have delineated character states, you can "polarize the
character", or more precisely polarize the transitions between its states.
You can polarize characters (-states) a priori, before phylogenetic
analysis, or a posteriori, as a result of the analysis: "checking" the
optimal polarized evolutionary scenarios on the rooted cladogram.
In phylogenetic inference, ordering characters is a coding procedure
consisting in giving a different weight to changes between different states
of a character. e.g. character A has three states 1,2,3. For the
analysis, you can order it this way: weight 1 for changes between 1 and 2,
and between 2 and 3, but weight 2 between 1 and 3. The implication is that
the character has to pass through state 2 when changing between states 1 and 3.
It thus appears that you can order a character (weight differently
different transitions between character states) without polarizing it (no a
priori preference for the direction of evolution, e.g. from state 1 to 3
versus from 3 to 1).
You can also combine a sophisticated ordering with polarization (e.g.,
stepmatrices of the program PAUP allow for weighting differently changes
betwen character states according to the polarity of change: 2->3 may
weight 1 while 3->2 weights 2).
At 14:16 06/01/2002 -0600, Ken Kinman wrote:
> I'll have to think about the semantics of this one. I was thinking that
>there is a difference between polarizing characters and polarizing
>"character states" (which is a special case of "ordering" character states).
> What term would one apply to polarizing (dividing) a character into
>just two character states? Whatever you call that kind of polarization, it
>needs to be done before one can perform a cladistic polarization (i.e., in
>the strict sense) of the "character states" (i.e. "ordering" sensu lato).
>Is Curtis referring to polarizing his characters, or is he just ordering the
> Don't mean to nitpick, but I've never really pondered the details of
>this terminology. I'll really have to give this some more thought.
> ------- Ken
>At 12:16 PM 1/6/02, Ken Kinman wrote:
>> What term would one apply to polarizing (dividing) a character into
>>just two character states?
>Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
>Biological Sciences Department Voice: (909) 869-4062
>California State Polytechnic University FAX: (909) 869-4078
>Pomona CA 91768-4032 USA jcclark at csupomona.edu
CNRS UMR 6552 - Station Biologique de Paimpont
F-35380 Paimpont FRANCE
Téléphone : 02 99 61 81 66
Télécopie : 02 99 61 81 88
More information about the Taxacom