A question about species authors

Paul van Rijckevorsel dipteryx at FREELER.NL
Fri Jun 4 20:29:36 CDT 2004

It seems that a precedent are the names by HBK, (Humboldt, Bonpland &
Kunth), which, however, are now being attributed by Kunth, who did the
actual writing. I must admit to never having looked up exact details.

A careful study of Art 46.2-4, 6 and accompanying examples will help.

Paul van Rijckevorsel
Utrecht, NL

----- Original Message -----
From: John Landolt <jlandolt at SHEPHERD.EDU>
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 8:02 PM
Subject: A question about species authors

> Dear Colleagues,
> In determining the names of persons who may be included as authors of
> proposed new species,  is it ever permissible to include the name of
> a person who was instrumental in providing financial, logistical
> support and editorial assistance in the discovery, collection and
> manuscript preparation associated with a proposed new taxon, even if
> this particular person is not a recognized taxonomist for the
> particular group of organisms in question (other authors listed as
> authors are so recognized).
> In a particular case I have in mind,  the first author of such
> proposed new species IS a recognized authority for the group and
> wishes to include in authorship of proposed new species, another
> person like that described above in the first paragraph.
> Is there a particular section of the ICBN that speaks to this point?
> Thanks in advance for any information that may be provided.
> Cheers,
> John
> --
> John C. Landolt
> Department of Biology
> Shepherd University
> P.O. Box 3210
> Shepherdstown, WV 25443 U.S.A.
> Ph: 304-876-5357
> jlandolt at shepherd.edu

More information about the Taxacom mailing list