follow up on paraphyly / polyphyly
barry_roth at YAHOO.COM
Thu Nov 11 09:15:16 CST 2004
The issue of whether a taxon or group of taxa is holophyletic or not was of
interest well before cladistic methodology came along. Hence, early
discussions of "natural" groups. A tree/phylogenic hypothesis can be inspected
for paraphyly or polyphyly regardless of how it was constructed. Nevertheless,
I agree that a theoretical framework should be decided upon explicitly early in
any discussion, if we want to get anywhere.
--- Michael Schmitt <m.schmitt at UNI-BONN.DE> wrote:
> Of course, everybody is free to deem my posting as ideological.
> Nevertheless, I uphold a view (obviously) opposite to that of Zdenek Skala:
> I think, first we have to choose a theoretical background or frame, and
> then we (can) decide on possible solutions to problems. In my opinion, it
> makes sense only against a certain theoretical background or within a
> certain methodological frame to discuss on "problems", since only after
> having chosen a certain background we can recognise problems at all.
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
More information about the Taxacom