rjensen at SAINTMARYS.EDU
Thu Nov 18 16:34:27 CST 2004
In my experience, neospecies refers to a recently diverged lineage that may
evolve into a species, if it survives. Protospecies might work as well.
I don't see why it shouldn't be used to refer to a lineage that arises through
hybridization, but I think the usage you describe is incorrect. If the authors
are describing a "full species" (I assume they mean that the entity in question
is taxonomically equivalent to the other species in their study group), then it
is simply a species, not a neospecies.
Ron Gatrelle wrote:
> I am editing a paper utilizing the term "neospecies". I am interested in
> how those here define and thus apply this term to a give taxon. Is this a
> new species (of recent evolutional origin), a pseudo species (not yet a
> species), or what. If there is some standardized definition of this I'd
> like to know. My concern is that different readers will take this to mean
> different things. The authors apply this to a full species that may have
> originated from a "recent" past hybridization.
> Ron Gatrelle
Richard J. Jensen | tel: 574-284-4674
Department of Biology | fax: 574-284-4716
Saint Mary's College | e-mail: rjensen at saintmarys.edu
Notre Dame, IN 46556 | http://www.saintmarys.edu/~rjensen
More information about the Taxacom