Predictivity vs Useful

Barry Roth barry_roth at YAHOO.COM
Mon Feb 14 09:08:02 CST 2005

I do not know the groups in question well enough to comment specifically, but
I'm quite sure that predictivity would be at its highest if the questions were
addressed to holophyletic subsets of those groups!  Perhaps the successful
predictions are largely based on homology, whether the investigator is aware of
it or not.



--- SKÁLA Zdenìk <skala at INCOMA.CZ> wrote:

> Think about groups like (dicot) herbs/trees, for example. They are extremly
> predictive in *many* characters and hugely polyphyletic at the same time.
> Best!
> Zdenek Skala
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry Roth [mailto:barry_roth at YAHOO.COM]
> Does anyone seriously doubt that, because of the fact of organic evolution,
> the
> classification that maximizes predictivity will be the one most fully based
> on
> genealogy/phylogeny?

Do you Yahoo!?
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard.

More information about the Taxacom mailing list