Are species real?
Don.Colless at CSIRO.AU
Don.Colless at CSIRO.AU
Tue Apr 11 14:53:58 CDT 2006
Anyone silly enough to get involved in this thread will soon find himself arguing about the meaning of "real" - and, in due course, about the meaning of "meaning". Beware.
-----Original Message-----
From: Taxacom Discussion List on behalf of Curtis Clark
Sent: Tue 4/11/2006 12:18 PM
To: TAXACOM at LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU
Cc:
Subject: Re: Are species real?
On 2006-04-10 11:31, Richard Pyle wrote:
> I don't buy the argument that the
> existence of quantifiable character clusters means that species are
> "real" -- for either plants or animals.
If species aren't real, then how can phylogenies be real? And if
phylogenies aren't real, isn't evolution just population genetics?
--
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Web Coordinator, Cal Poly Pomona +1 909 979 6371
Professor, Biological Sciences +1 909 869 4062
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list