[Taxacom] Cladifications are NOT classifications (Mona Lisadrooling)

Barry Roth barry_roth at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 1 13:59:59 CDT 2006


"Edwards, G.B." <edwardg at doacs.state.fl.us> wrote:    I agree. In fact, after reading the exchanges on this subject, it seems
that 'classification' will be a never ending source of controversy. So
why don't we just forget it, and let the 'phylogeny' fall where it may
with the available data. 
  As appealing as the idea is, the (estimate of) phylogeny does not just fall where it may, but depends on the method of analysis.  Or am I missing some semi-facetiousness here?
   
  Barry Roth

 		
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
 Everyone is raving about the  all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom



More information about the Taxacom mailing list