[Taxacom] Cladifications are NOT classifications (Mona Lisadrooling)
barry_roth at yahoo.com
Tue Aug 1 13:59:59 CDT 2006
"Edwards, G.B." <edwardg at doacs.state.fl.us> wrote: I agree. In fact, after reading the exchanges on this subject, it seems
that 'classification' will be a never ending source of controversy. So
why don't we just forget it, and let the 'phylogeny' fall where it may
with the available data.
As appealing as the idea is, the (estimate of) phylogeny does not just fall where it may, but depends on the method of analysis. Or am I missing some semi-facetiousness here?
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail Beta.
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom