[Taxacom] Mona Lisa Smile
Thomas G. Lammers
lammers at uwosh.edu
Wed Jul 26 08:29:02 CDT 2006
At 08:22 AM 7/26/2006, Mary Barkworth wrote:
>My message to students is somewhat different from Tom's: Classifications
>are for humans (I sometimes add computers). Humans like neat boxes. They
>aid us in communication and summarizing our ideas. Plants do what plants
>do. [I am a botanist]. Sometimes what they do frustrates the goals of
>humans. That is life. Yes, I do talk also about principles of
>classification and the like, so we get into testing predictions of a
>classification, but the bottom line is that classification is by humans
>for humans. Sometimes it will be frustrated by biological reality.
I'm not sure that's really any different. My "Classifications Are
Hypotheses" admonition carries the same implicit idea, in as much as
hypotheses are human constructs we use to understand the world around
us. We both do not pretend there is any objective reality to our
classifications. I do not think anything above the level of populations is
"real," and even populations can be very very nebulous.
Thomas G. Lammers, Ph.D.
Associate Professor and Curator of the Herbarium (OSH)
Department of Biology and Microbiology
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901-8640 USA
e-mail: lammers at uwosh.edu
Plant systematics; classification, nomenclature, evolution, and
biogeography of the Campanulaceae s. lat.
"Today's mighty oak is yesterday's nut that stood his ground."
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom