[Taxacom] Gansus fossils overly hyped?
kinman at hotmail.com
Fri Jun 16 14:16:57 CDT 2006
Glad to see Clarke got in a plug for her fossil genus Vegavis, but it
is an Anseriform (neognath). The common ancestor of all living birds would
have been more like a paleognath and probably terrestrial (unlike either
Gansus or Vegavis).
A better model would be a proto-tinamou (similar to modern tinamous,
but stronger fliers). As for fossils, Lithornithidae would be closer than
either Gansus or Vegavis.
>From: Barry Roth <barry_roth at yahoo.com>
>To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Gansus fossils overly hyped?
>Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:58:19 -0700 (PDT)
>The San Francisco Chronicle's story on the subject contains
>counterbalancing views of some other paleontologists:
> Barry Roth
>Ken Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Dear All,
>Finally, publication on a fantastic find of nearly complete fossils of
>the Cretaceous bird Gansus. However, to say that this amphibious waterfowl
>is a good model for the ancestor of modern birds is a very risky
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>Taxacom mailing list
>Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom