Naming a species after yourself (zoology)
Shen-Horn Yen (home)
shenhornyen at HOTMAIL.COM
Tue Mar 7 02:24:46 CST 2006
I have seen a similar case, not quite the same, but tacky as yours.
In the same issue of the same journal, A author named a new subgenus of the
genus C after B author, and B author named a new subgenus of the genus C
after A author in the next paper. Then they thanked each other in their
Both subgenera are monotypic, and, surely it is not Code violation, just
making the taxonomy "untouchable"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Yanega" <dyanega at UCR.EDU>
To: <TAXACOM at LISTSERV.NHM.KU.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2006 1:55 AM
Subject: Re: [TAXACOM] Naming a species after yourself (zoology)
> >Hi Taxacomers,
>>I have a manuscript in which the 3rd author is being honored with a
>>being named after him.
>>It is my belief, but I cannot find a statement in the ICZN, that this is a
>>That is, I can name something after you, and you can name it after me,
>>but you and I cannot name a species after me.
>>Am I correct? If the answer is in ICZN (4th edition), could someone
>>direct me to the article or recommendation?
> It's considered tacky and amateurish, but it's not a Code violation.
> Consider the beetle Cartwrightia cartwrighti Cartwright, for example.
> Doug Yanega Dept. of Entomology Entomology Research Museum
> Univ. of California - Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521-0314
> phone: (951) 827-4315 (standard disclaimer: opinions are mine, not UCR's)
> "There are some enterprises in which a careful disorderliness
> is the true method" - Herman Melville, Moby Dick, Chap. 82
More information about the Taxacom