[Taxacom] Concladic or concladal? (To clade or not to clade)

Kevin Thiele K.Thiele at cbit.uq.edu.au
Wed May 24 18:12:25 CDT 2006

OK - this then begs the question - is this the first good cladistic joke (of
course, some may regard that cladistics was the first good joke, but we'll
set that aside)

Cheers - k

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Barry Roth
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 8:29 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Concladic or concladal? (To clade or not to clade)

Because I speak English, not Greek, and -al is readily understood as an
attributive suffix in English, the issue of a Greek root is not merely
academic, it is irrelevant.  Apart from the freedom which I as the coiner
(if indeed I am that august and front-running individual) enjoy in making up
words as I please -- and Humpty-Dumpty had something to say on a related
matter -- I like the ululating flow of "concladal" better than the click of
  "Who was that concladal I saw you with last night?"
  "That was no concladal, that was my sister-group."
  Cheers back,

Ken Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com> wrote:
  I have certainly seen the word contaxic, but not "concladal". 
However, since the root comes from the Greek "klados", wouldn't the 
preferable spelling perhaps be "concladic"? I'm not sure.
Ken Kinman

Blab-away for as little as 1ยข/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo!
Messenger with Voice.
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

More information about the Taxacom mailing list