[Taxacom] Concladic or concladal? (To clade or not to clade)

Kevin Thiele K.Thiele at cbit.uq.edu.au
Wed May 24 18:12:25 CDT 2006


OK - this then begs the question - is this the first good cladistic joke (of
course, some may regard that cladistics was the first good joke, but we'll
set that aside)

Cheers - k

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Barry Roth
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 8:29 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Concladic or concladal? (To clade or not to clade)

Because I speak English, not Greek, and -al is readily understood as an
attributive suffix in English, the issue of a Greek root is not merely
academic, it is irrelevant.  Apart from the freedom which I as the coiner
(if indeed I am that august and front-running individual) enjoy in making up
words as I please -- and Humpty-Dumpty had something to say on a related
matter -- I like the ululating flow of "concladal" better than the click of
"concladic":
   
  "Who was that concladal I saw you with last night?"
   
  "That was no concladal, that was my sister-group."
   
  Cheers back,
   
  Barry

Ken Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com> wrote:
  I have certainly seen the word contaxic, but not "concladal". 
However, since the root comes from the Greek "klados", wouldn't the 
preferable spelling perhaps be "concladic"? I'm not sure.
----Cheers,
Ken Kinman


		
---------------------------------
Blab-away for as little as 1ยข/min. Make  PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo!
Messenger with Voice.
_______________________________________________
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom






More information about the Taxacom mailing list