[Taxacom] Concladic or concladal? (To clade or not to clade)
K.Thiele at cbit.uq.edu.au
Wed May 24 18:12:25 CDT 2006
OK - this then begs the question - is this the first good cladistic joke (of
course, some may regard that cladistics was the first good joke, but we'll
set that aside)
Cheers - k
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Barry Roth
Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 8:29 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Concladic or concladal? (To clade or not to clade)
Because I speak English, not Greek, and -al is readily understood as an
attributive suffix in English, the issue of a Greek root is not merely
academic, it is irrelevant. Apart from the freedom which I as the coiner
(if indeed I am that august and front-running individual) enjoy in making up
words as I please -- and Humpty-Dumpty had something to say on a related
matter -- I like the ululating flow of "concladal" better than the click of
"Who was that concladal I saw you with last night?"
"That was no concladal, that was my sister-group."
Ken Kinman <kinman at hotmail.com> wrote:
I have certainly seen the word contaxic, but not "concladal".
However, since the root comes from the Greek "klados", wouldn't the
preferable spelling perhaps be "concladic"? I'm not sure.
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo!
Messenger with Voice.
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom