[Taxacom] Tetrastigma tuberculatum: nom. illeg.?
lammers at uwosh.edu
Mon Aug 20 16:33:44 CDT 2007
I don't have the ICBN handy, but isn't this one of those cases where the correct name becomes Tetrastigma tuberculatum Latiff?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boggan, John" <BOGGANJ at si.edu>
Date: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:18 pm
Subject: [Taxacom] Tetrastigma tuberculatum: nom. illeg.?
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> In 2001, A. Latiff made the combination Tetrastigma tuberculatum
> (Blume)Latiff, based on Cissus tuberculata Blume, in separating
> out a taxon
> (including numerous synonyms) that had previously been included in
> Tetrastigma leucostaphylum (Dennst.) Alston ex Mabberley.
> So far so
> good, but my concern is with nomenclature rather than circumscription.
> As far as I can figure out, Cissus tuberculata Blume (1825) is a later
> homonym of Cissus tuberculata Jacquin (1797). The latter
> name, with a
> type from Cuba, is synonymized under Cissus obovata Vahl by
> Lombardi in
> a recent Flora Neotropica treatment of Vitaceae (with no
> indication that
> it is a nom. nud.). It seems that this name should block Cissus
> tuberculata Blume, and therefore Tetrastigma tuberculatum
> (Blume) Latiff
> is an illegitimate name, having as its basionym a later homonym.
> John Boggan
> Department of Botany, MRC 166
> National Museum of Natural History
> Smithsonian Institution
> P.O. Box 37012
> Washington, DC 20013-7012
> Email: Bogganj at si.edu
> Phone: (202) 633-0895
> FAX: (202) 786-2563
> Department website: http://www.nmnh.si.edu
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom