[Taxacom] Tetrastigma tuberculatum: nom. illeg.?
BOGGANJ at si.edu
Tue Aug 21 08:01:03 CDT 2007
I thought I knew the Code pretty well but overlooked Art. 58.1. Despite
being published as an avowed combination, Tetrastigma tuberculatum
Latiff 2001 is apparently to be considered a nom. nov. for Cissus
tuberculata Blume (non Jacq.), with the same type.
Unfortunately there's more: at the same time he made the "combination",
Latiff synonymized several species under T. tuberculatum: Cissus
mutabilis Bl. (1825), Tetrastigma mutabile (Bl.) Planch. (1887),
Tetrastigma encephalospermum Ridl. (1926), Vitis kunstleri King (1896),
Tetrastigma kunstleri (King) Craib (1926), Vitis rafflesiae Miq.
(1863-64) & Tetrastigma rafflesiae (Miq.) Planch. (1887). If I'm looking
at these names and dates right, he should have taken up T. mutabile
(Bl.) Planch. as the correct name for this taxon, as Cissus mutabilis
Bl. (1825) is the next oldest name after Cissus tuberculata Bl.
(actually published at the same time) and therefore has priority over T.
tuberculatum Latiff (2001) IF all these taxa are combined under one
Department of Botany, MRC 166
National Museum of Natural History
P.O. Box 37012
Washington, DC 20013-7012
Email: Bogganj at si.edu
Phone: (202) 633-0895
FAX: (202) 786-2563
Department website: http://www.nmnh.si.edu
From: Thomas Lammers [mailto:lammers at uwosh.edu]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 5:34 PM
To: Boggan, John
Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Tetrastigma tuberculatum: nom. illeg.?
I don't have the ICBN handy, but isn't this one of those cases where the
correct name becomes Tetrastigma tuberculatum Latiff?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Boggan, John" <BOGGANJ at si.edu>
Date: Monday, August 20, 2007 4:18 pm
Subject: [Taxacom] Tetrastigma tuberculatum: nom. illeg.?
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> In 2001, A. Latiff made the combination Tetrastigma tuberculatum
> (Blume)Latiff, based on Cissus tuberculata Blume, in separating
> out a taxon
> (including numerous synonyms) that had previously been included in
> Tetrastigma leucostaphylum (Dennst.) Alston ex Mabberley.
> So far so
> good, but my concern is with nomenclature rather than circumscription.
> As far as I can figure out, Cissus tuberculata Blume (1825) is a later
> homonym of Cissus tuberculata Jacquin (1797). The latter
> name, with a
> type from Cuba, is synonymized under Cissus obovata Vahl by
> Lombardi in
> a recent Flora Neotropica treatment of Vitaceae (with no
> indication that
> it is a nom. nud.). It seems that this name should block Cissus
> tuberculata Blume, and therefore Tetrastigma tuberculatum
> (Blume) Latiff
> is an illegitimate name, having as its basionym a later homonym.
> John Boggan
> Department of Botany, MRC 166
> National Museum of Natural History
> Smithsonian Institution
> P.O. Box 37012
> Washington, DC 20013-7012
> Email: Bogganj at si.edu
> Phone: (202) 633-0895
> FAX: (202) 786-2563
> Department website: http://www.nmnh.si.edu
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom