[Taxacom] Tetrastigma tuberculatum: nom. illeg.?
Thomas G. Lammers
lammers at uwosh.edu
Tue Aug 21 08:39:02 CDT 2007
At 08:01 AM 8/21/2007, Boggan, John wrote:
>I thought I knew the Code pretty well but overlooked Art. 58.1. Despite
>being published as an avowed combination, Tetrastigma tuberculatum Latiff
>2001 is apparently to be considered a nom. nov. for Cissus tuberculata
>Blume (non Jacq.), with the same type.
Yes, that's the chapter-and-verse I had in mind.
>Unfortunately there's more: at the same time he made the "combination",
>Latiff synonymized several species under T. tuberculatum: Cissus mutabilis
>Bl. (1825), Tetrastigma mutabile (Bl.) Planch. (1887), Tetrastigma
>encephalospermum Ridl. (1926), Vitis kunstleri King (1896), Tetrastigma
>kunstleri (King) Craib (1926), Vitis rafflesiae Miq. (1863-64) &
>Tetrastigma rafflesiae (Miq.) Planch. (1887). If I'm looking at these
>names and dates right, he should have taken up T. mutabile (Bl.) Planch.
>as the correct name for this taxon, as Cissus mutabilis Bl. (1825) is the
>next oldest name after Cissus tuberculata Bl. (actually published at the
>same time) and therefore has priority over T. tuberculatum Latiff (2001)
>IF all these taxa are combined under one name.
Not the first time I've seen perfectly valid names cited in synonymy under
a nom. nov., unfortunately.
I've always said the ICBN is a lot like the Bible -- people THINK they know
what's in it, but few actually sit down and study it!
Thomas G. Lammers, Ph.D.
Associate Professor and Curator of the Herbarium (OSH)
Department of Biology and Microbiology
University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
Oshkosh, Wisconsin 54901-8640 USA
e-mail: lammers at uwosh.edu
Plant systematics; classification, nomenclature, evolution, and
biogeography of the Campanulaceae s. lat.
"Today's mighty oak is yesterday's nut that stood his ground."
More information about the Taxacom