[Taxacom] Homalozoan classification (still stem-group echinoderms?)
Ken Kinman
kinman at hotmail.com
Tue May 1 21:23:56 CDT 2007
Dear All,
Due to the continued bitter controversy over homalozoans (early
echinoderms or early "carpoid" chordates?), I haven't really been inclined
to attempt an updated classification since my 1994 book. However, I have
seen nothing since that changes my mind about them being stem-group
echinoderms.
Among those who do regard them as stem-echinoderms, there is a growing
consensus that homalozoans are a paraphyletic taxon. In 1994 I classified
Class Homalozoea (sensu stricto) as separate from Class Helicoplacoidea, but
it is now pretty clear that even Class Homalozoea (sensu stricto) is still
paraphyletic, so I am going to now formally recognize (and code) them as
such (including helicoplacoids as derived members that are sister group to
crown group echinoderms).
I am also adding the more recently discovered Order Vetulocystida at
the base of Class Homalozoea. I am still including Cambroclavida (incertae
sedis) even though some workers now place them near acanthocephalans (not
echinoderms). I don't think anyone really knows where cambroclaves will end
up. However, I am going to now omit the problematic Order Cymbionitida
(haplozoans), because they probably fit better in with my broad Class
Crinoidea (including blastozoans). Whether a broad Class Crinoidea is
holophyletic is something I will have to tackle next. Anyway, here is my
updated and recoded classification of Class Homalozoea (including
helicoplacoids, but excluding haplozoans):
PHYLUM ECHINODERMATA
1 Homalozoea% (Cambrian-Carboniferous)
1 Vetulocystida
? Cambroclavida (affinities very uncertain)
2 Stylophorida
3 Solutida
4 Cinctida
5 Ctenocystida
6 Helicoplacida
B Polyplacida
7 {{crown group echinoderms}}
_1_ Crinoidea
2 Edrioasteroidea
3 Asteroidea, etc.
-----------------------------------
NOTES: Cinctida and Solutida are here no longer considered sister taxa,
although they are closely related and still form an informal paraphyletic
grouping. Also note that "Heterostelea" might belong in Homalozoea, but I
am still betting that they will end up in one of the crown group classes.
As always, I am open to suggestions, especially relating to such
controversial fossil problematica.
----Ken Kinman
_________________________________________________________________
Interest Rates NEAR 39yr LOWS! $430,000 Mortgage for $1,299/mo - Calculate
new payment
http://www.lowermybills.com/lre/index.jsp?sourceid=lmb-9632-19132&moid=14888
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list