[Taxacom] holotype for sale
peter.stevens at mobot.org
Fri Sep 14 12:06:15 CDT 2007
No, if you read the orchid paper the dates for the amber they use are
in line with some previous estimates, and are "reasonable" (whatever
that means); the Burmese amber is a different kettle of fish.
On Sep 12, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Paul van Rijckevorsel wrote:
> From: "Karl Magnacca" <kmagnacca at alumni.wesleyan.edu>
>> On 12 Sep 2007 at 8:59, Peter Stevens wrote:
>>> There is something funny about this amber - dating may be wrong, or
>>> something. A fairly "modern" grass was described from this amber,
>>> and if its dating is correct, it completely changes dates for
>>> angiosperm evolution...
> Curious coincidence: Nature (30 august) ran an cover article about
> a piece
> of amber, which, if its dating is correct, completely changes dates
> orchid evolution.
> (Some details here http://research.leidenuniv.nl/index.php3?c=362)
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom