[Taxacom] Patterns of homoplasy
jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
Tue Aug 19 16:58:37 CDT 2008
My reading of orthogenesis was that it was originally conceptulaized as a hypothesis for a biological mechanism for evolutionary change (i.e. that evolution may occur even without natural selection), and was not confined in its scope to homoplasy.
In another respect, the problem of homoplasy may be exacerbated by the way characters are interpreted. The molecular phylogeny of humans and great apes, for example, generates quite an immense amount of 'homoplasy' in biological (non-nucleic acid) characters whereas the biological phylogeny does not.
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu on behalf of Curtis Clark
Sent: Tue 8/19/2008 4:35 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Patterns of homoplasy
On 2008-08-19 06:46, Peter Stevens wrote:
> Of course, there are several
> papers on "tendencies" from back in the 1980s and early 90s, but this
> line of thought didn't get very far then.
It never occurred to me before now, but orthogenesis was in some senses
an attempt to explain homoplasy (although its practitioners would not
have used that term).
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Director, I&IT Web Development +1 909 979 6371
University Web Coordinator, Cal Poly Pomona
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
More information about the Taxacom