[Taxacom] Proposed ICZN amendments on electronic publishing
jcclark-lists at earthlink.net
Wed Dec 10 00:09:26 CST 2008
On 2008-12-04 23:11, Jim Croft wrote:
> While we can say it is 'all
> important' too, in the migrating digital world importance is (or has
> been) guaged by whether the item is still in use at the time of
> migration. For managers of archival things and information, this is
> the stuff of nightmares.
Our information security folks are considering getting a network
monitoring appliance that comes standard with 14 terabytes of storage
and can be expanded, iirc, to 200 terabytes, and that's for storing
*network traffic* in order to investigate security breaches. I just
recently installed a 1 terabyte second drive in my computer at work.
Storage is so ridiculously cheap that it is easier and less costly to
save everything when data are transferred than it is to winnow. At the
same time, our library has discarded physical books for lack of storage
space. As the world fills up with stuff, digital records may be
increasingly more likely to be retained than physical ones.
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Director, I&IT Web Development +1 909 979 6371
University Web Coordinator, Cal Poly Pomona
More information about the Taxacom