[Taxacom] Justifying species?

Bob Mesibov mesibov at southcom.com.au
Mon Feb 18 16:42:17 CST 2008


Dick Jensen wrote:

"It is important, under many existing laws, for endangered taxa to be
recognized as species and the greater the justification for declaring a
taxonomic entity to be a species, the more likely it is to be eligible
for protection."

Interesting you raise that point. In the case of the Apteropanorpidae in
the paper I cited, nearly the entire distribution of the family is
within very secure reserves: national parks largely within a World
Heritage Area. Almost as a footnote, the authors point out that one of
the sampled populations of a widespread species is on a mountain
"surrounded by pasture and timber plantations. There is no corridor
linking this population to others in the family... ...preservation of
all populations is essential because together they represent at least
six million years of evolutionary history..." etc etc.

It's clear from the rest of the paper, however, that the authors were
defending their erection of two new species on biological, not political
grounds.
-- 
Dr Robert Mesibov
Honorary Research Associate, Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery
and School of Zoology, University of Tasmania
Contact: PO Box 101, Penguin, Tasmania, Australia 7316
(03) 64371195; 61 3 64371195

Australian millipedes checklist
http://www.qvmag.tas.gov.au/zoology/millipedes/index.html
Tasmanian multipedes
http://www.qvmag.tas.gov.au/zoology/multipedes/mulintro.html
Spatial data basics for Tasmania
http://www.utas.edu.au/spatial/locations/index.html
Biodiversity salvage blog
http://biodiversitysalvage.blogspot.com
---






More information about the Taxacom mailing list