[Taxacom] New Cladistics program?

Richard Zander Richard.Zander at mobot.org
Fri Feb 29 10:19:02 CST 2008

That would be "phrenetics" or the system of thought experiments with
commonly well supported results.

Richard H. Zander 
Voice: 314-577-0276
Missouri Botanical Garden
PO Box 299
St. Louis, MO 63166-0299 USA
richard.zander at mobot.org
Web sites: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/resbot/
and http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/bfna/bfnamenu.htm

For FedEx and UPS use:
Missouri Botanical Garden
4344 Shaw Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63110

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Richard Jensen
Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 9:04 AM
To: Curtis Clark
Cc: taxacom
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] New Cladistics program?

Thanks, Curtis. I was at a loss but what you have described makes good 

This may provide a better understanding on saltation - evolutionary 
leaps that are made possible by Riemannian bridges or wormholes. 
Eventually we may be able to go "Back to the Past" as well as the

Dick J

Richard Jensen, Professor
Department of Biology
Saint Mary's College
Notre Dame, IN 46556
Tel: 574-284-4674

Curtis Clark wrote:
> On 2008-02-25 11:52, Richard Jensen wrote:
>> I am proofreading a paper and came across this line:
>> "Phylogenetic analyses were performed with PHYLIP, the Phylogeny 
>> Interference Package, using Maximum Parsimony (MP)."
>> Could this be a Hennigian slip? Or, can software really interfere
>> our understanding of what's going on?
> No, it means "interference" in the physics sense. Each character has a

> phylogenetic signal. Combining those signals as if they were wave
> results in some nodes being amplified and others being canceled out. 
> This method is criticized by proponents of Quantum Phylogeny, who
> that phylogenies are best characterized as streams of particles rather

> than as waves.

Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

More information about the Taxacom mailing list