[Taxacom] [Not-Taxacom] taxon wikipedia type resources

Jim Croft jim.croft at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 18:16:52 CDT 2008

>> other
>> taxonomists (defined, e.g., as anyone who has published at least 5
>> new taxa, at least 90% of which are not considered synonyms - so as
>> not to exclude the many competent "amateurs"), and non-taxonomists
>> were only allowed to *comment*?

As a proud author in an internationally respected peer reviewed
journal of a new plant family that no-one has acknowledged or even
bothered to refer to in the quarter century since it was published, I
can not possibly agree to this.

It is so very tempting it is to launch into wikipedia and wikispecies
in a defiant act of self vindication and self-righteous assertion of
superior judgement.  But modesty forbids...  :)


Jim Croft
jim.croft at gmail.com

"Words, as is well known, are the great foes of reality."
- Joseph Conrad, author (1857-1924)

More information about the Taxacom mailing list