[Taxacom] iSpecies automated tagging

Geoff Read g.read at niwa.co.nz
Wed Jul 30 16:38:53 CDT 2008

>>> On 30/07/2008 at 9:56 p.m., Roderic Page <R.Page at bio.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
> I've added an experimental feature to iSpecies (http://ispecies.org),  
> namely automated "tagging". Keywords from any article titles and  
> Wikipedia entries are extracted and displayed as tags (see 
> http://iphylo.blogspot.com/2008/07/ispecies-gets-automated-tagging.html 
>   for details).
> It's all a bit crude, but seems a surprisingly effective way to get a  
> snapshot of what we know about a taxon.

That's great.  However, as a side issue, since this is a taxonomy list, I'm wondering about the blog example Helice crassa, suddenly in Wikipedia very recently becoming Austrohelice crassa (Austrohelice apparently a monotypic genus), without apparently raising an eyebrow amongst the Wikipedians, and more importantly, without a reference, or comment.  I mean - isn't the why interesting?  Would be to me as a reader. Strange. There's a little bit more under Varunidae, but no page for Austrohelice.

Good to see though that GenBank is up with it, thanks to someone, and has the monograph ref.



More information about the Taxacom mailing list