[Taxacom] Wrongly named by scientists

Tony.Rees at csiro.au Tony.Rees at csiro.au
Mon Jun 30 22:45:07 CDT 2008

Actually, I'm personally looking forward to scientists naming the next 3m species or so out there (or is it 10m?) - so much more fun to be had giving things wrong names on purpose, then generating some news events when correcting them...

Tony Rees
Manager, Divisional Data Centre,
CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research

-----Original Message-----
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Croft
Sent: Monday, 30 June 2008 11:49 PM
To: Mike Dallwitz
Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Wrongly named by scientists

> The difference is that other scientists don't spend a large part of their
> time searching for, recording, analyzing, and republishing the mistakes of
> the past. We might see a similar news article if a research organisation
> makes a press release on advances in the chemistry of phlogiston.

And what's wrong with phlogiston?  For three decades I have been
claiming miasma on sick leave certificates and not once has it been
queried or challenged.  So it must be true.


Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu

More information about the Taxacom mailing list