[Taxacom] Taxonomy in Europe in the 21st century

[Mary Barkworth]

What would be the implications of "deprecation"?  The production of
articles supporting deprecation of individual names? Would this require
as as much, or almost as much, effort as finding a lectotype and/or
establishing a neotype? There are better things to do with one's time. 
 
For some names, a change in the Code could lead to a relatively simple
solution. I am thinking of non-controversial names that are in common
use but for which it is known that the type no longer exists. Despite
this, no neotype has been established. In my case it is simply because
it would take time, effort, and money but accomplish nothing very
valuable. The difficulty is in locating a specimen the author might have
seen, perhaps. The author lived in Europe, long ago; I live in the US,
now. Lectotypification is possible - but it really will not change
things.   In such cases, it would be useful to be able to select a
neotype in an institution near or in the species' current distribution
[more useful than having an old fragmentary specimen on a different
continent] that fits the non-controversial use of the name and just move
on. No, I have never proposed an amendment to the Code in this respect.
Of course, the kind of names I describe are "in common use" so would not
be on the deprecated list. 
Mary
________________________________

From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu on behalf of Roger Hyam (TDWG)
Sent: Fri 5/9/2008 4:17 AM
To: Gael Lancelot
Cc: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Taxonomy in Europe in the 21st century




We could have a register of botanical names  with a fast and efficient 
system for deprecating names which are not in current use or supported 
by good descriptions and types (instead of spending years trying to 
lectotypify them) that would save some time and cost comparatively 
little.

But then I'll probably get flamed for even suggesting such a thing :)

Roger


On 6 May 2008, at 11:32, Gael Lancelot wrote:

> Dear TAXACOMers,
>
> As we all know, taxonomy is at a crossroads. As the most fundamental 
> of life sciences, is more vital than ever to our understanding and 
> management of biodiversity. Societal changes and new technologies 
> currently lead to fast and deep-ranging transformations in taxonomic 
> science.
>
> To plan for the future, the European Distributed Institute of 
> Taxonomy has gathered prominent researchers in the relevant fields 
> as well as young scientists, all with an established production of 
> excellent research. They have produced a scientific vision for the 
> future of taxonomy in the next 10 to 20 years. This report, 
> *"Taxonomy in Europe in the 21^st Century",* is now released for 
> discussion in the scientific community and general public. It is 
> available at the following address:
http://ww2.bgbm.org/EditDocumentRepository/Taxonomy21report.pdf
>
> The overall conclusions of the report are:
>
>   * That taxonomy faces exciting challenges and opportunities in the
>     future to meet the demand for an ever more profound understanding
>     of the diversity of life on this planet, how it developed and the
>     impact of increasingly destructive human activity including
>     climate change, factors that are predicted to have an enormous
>     negative influence on the diversity and distribution of
>     biodiversity (the biodiversity crisis)
>   * Pivotal to the development of taxonomy are the rapidly expanding
>     fields of high throughput DNA sequencing, automated digital
>     data-gathering and biodiversity informatics. Incorporating these
>     technologies will be critical to the science of taxonomy.
>   * Scientific collaborators and users of taxonomy will require new
>     ways of working and interacting with taxonomists. It is essential
>     that taxonomists and their users respond to this need. Taxonomists
>     integrated into interdisciplinary teams will be an essential way
>     of working.
>   * Although an ever expanding repertoire of theoretical and practical
>     tools is available to taxonomists, unheralded in the history of
>     the subject, there will have to be substantial, even radical,
>     changes in how taxonomy is done and its supporting infrastructure
>     operated, to exploit these opportunities to the full. "Business as
>     usual", even if scaled up, is simply not an option.
>
> The Board of Directors of EDIT, representing 27 major taxonomic 
> institutions in and outside Europe, has approved this document as a 
> scientific roadmap for future development of taxonomy in research, 
> training and technology in the coming decades.
>
> More information on EDIT is available at http://e-taxonomy.eu
<http://e-taxonomy.eu/>  <http://e-taxonomy.eu/ 
> >. Any questions or reactions will be welcome at lancelot at mnhn.fr
<mailto:lancelot at mnhn.fr 
> >.
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Gaël Lancelot
> Communication Officer
> European Institute of Taxonomy
> Tel: (0033)1 40 79 80 19
> lancelot at mnhn.fr
> http://e-taxonomy.eu <http://e-taxonomy.eu/> 
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom


_______________________________________________
Taxacom mailing list
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom