[Taxacom] Biological Taxonomy Vocabulary 0.1

[Jim Croft]

Did not really get this one at all...  It looked more like a
vocabulary for an classification hierarchy than a taxonomy.
Typification?  Concepts?  Synonyms?  References?   Or is this
overloading the notion of 'taxonomy'?

But even as a classification hierarchy it seems quite a bit deficient
for, say, botany.  Did I miss something?

jim

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Andy Mabbett <andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk> wrote:
> In message <005601c8c092$26edb550$2b4c4451 at magnifica2>, Paul van
> Rijckevorsel <dipteryx at freeler.nl> writes
>
>>>        Unable to find a vocabulary that was satisfactory for my needs,
>>>        I've put together a simple vocabulary for biological taxonomy.
>
>>This is a definition of terms satisfactory for his needs, rather than a
>>vocabulary (of any sort) for biological taxonomy, although I will admit
>>that I am not entirely sure what this "biological taxonomy" may be.
>
> I should have made clear that it's an RDF vocabulary:
>
>        <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource_Description_Framework>
>
> --
> Andy Mabbett
>            Says  "NO! to compulsory UK ID Cards":  <http://www.no2id.net/>
>            and:  "Free Our Data":  <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
>                   (both also on Facebook)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>



-- 
_________________
Jim Croft
jim.croft at gmail.com

"I don't know why we are here, but I'm pretty sure that it is not in
order to enjoy ourselves."
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, philosopher (1889-1951)