[Taxacom] RES: what counts

Vitor Fernandes de Miranda vmiranda at umc.br
Wed Sep 17 07:56:29 CDT 2008


Dear Pierre,

Do you have this paper in PDF? Could you send it?

Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Vítor.
____________________________________________
Prof.Dr. Vítor Fernandes Oliveira de Miranda
Curador HUMC
Universidade de Mogi da Cruzes - UMC
Laboratório de Sistemática Vegetal (LSV/NCA)
Herbarium Mogiense - HUMC (Sala 21.16 - Prédio II)
Av. Dr. Cândido Xavier de Almeida Souza, n.200
CEP 08780-911 - Moji das Cruzes - SP - Brasil
Fone/FAX: +55 (11) 4798-7094
http://www.umc.br/~vmiranda
http://www.umc.br/herbario
e-mail: vmiranda at umc.br
 
 
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
> bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] Em nome de Pierre Deleporte
> Enviada em: quarta-feira, 17 de setembro de 2008 07:42
> Para: John Grehan
> Cc: TAXACOM
> Assunto: Re: [Taxacom] what counts
> 
> 
> Pogue M. G. and Mickevich M. F. 1990.
> Character definitions and character state delineation: the Bete Noire of
> phylogenetic inference
> Cladistics 6, 319-362.
> 
> 
> John Grehan a écrit :
> > With regard to the recent discussion about homoplasy etc, I find in
> > practice that much of the problem can lie with the original delineation
> > of characters. I have mentioned in hominid systematics how so much of it
> > is sloppy, being poorly documented if at all (and often without holotype
> > access), but here is an illustrative example from primate systematics.
> > A recent paper by Bajpai et al (2008) (The oldest Asian record of
> > Anthropoidea, PNAS 105, 11093-11098) purports to have discovered the
> > oldest anthropoid fossil, but represented by three teeth. So one would
> > expect to see a list of one or more apomorphies that corroborate these
> > teeth conforming to the anthropoid clade. But there was none that I
> > could find. In addition I could not even find reference to primate
> > characters let alone anthropoid. Also, I could not find any reference to
> > outgroup comparisons for confirming that their ingroup character states
> > were unique to the ingroup. Yet they published a phylogenetic analysis
> > with a lot of characters in one of the most prestigious journals in the
> > US. So am I missing something? Am I just stupid? Any comment?
> >
> >
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Dr. John R. Grehan
> >
> > Director of Science
> >
> > Buffalo Museum of Science1020 Humboldt Parkway
> >
> > Buffalo, NY 14211-1193
> >
> > email: jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
> >
> > Phone: (716) 896-5200 ext 372
> >
> >
> >
> > Panbiogeography
> >
> > http://www.sciencebuff.org/biogeography_and_evolutionary_biology.php
> >
> > Ghost moth research
> >
> > http://www.sciencebuff.org/systematics_and_evolution_of_hepialdiae.php
> >
> > Human evolution and the great apes
> >
> > http://www.sciencebuff.org/human_origin_and_the_great_apes.php
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Taxacom mailing list
> > Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> > http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> >
> 
> --
> Pierre Deleporte
> Université de Rennes 1
> CNRS UMR 6552
> Station Biologique de Paimpont
> F-35380 Paimpont   FRANCE
> Téléphone : 02 99 61 81 63
> Télécopie : 02 99 61 81 88
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taxacom mailing list
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1675 - Release Date:
> 16/09/2008 19:06
> 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG. 
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.21/1675 - Release Date: 16/09/2008 19:06
 




More information about the Taxacom mailing list