[Taxacom] Endless debate
jcclark-lists at earthlink.net
Mon Apr 6 22:18:20 CDT 2009
On 2009-04-06 19:58, Kenneth Kinman wrote:
> I'm not sure if you are finally agreeing with me or just teasing?
I don't think your classifications are useful, but I was suggesting that
Richard might, since they seem to meet his aims.
> In other words, a
> "Paraphylocode" would mostly likely be just a smoke screen for
You misunderstand. The "paraphylocode" I propose would consist of
nothing but grade taxa, delimited by key innovations. It would be to
grades as phylocode is to clades. I disagree with grade-based
classification, but I have suggested a way to make it rigorous, if
anyone were interested, which it seems no one is, because all of you who
support grade-based groups seem content to mix them willy-nilly with clades.
Curtis Clark http://www.csupomona.edu/~jcclark/
Director, I&IT Web Development +1 909 979 6371
University Web Coordinator, Cal Poly Pomona
More information about the Taxacom