[Taxacom] Citing taxonomical works (was: decline and fall oftaxonomy)
Hovenkamp, P. (Peter)
Hovenkamp at nhn.leidenuniv.nl
Thu Jun 18 07:25:25 CDT 2009
On this topic, see also:
Seifert, Crous & Frisvad 2008: Correcting the Impact Factors of
Taxonomic Journals by
Appropriate Citation of Taxonomy (ACT)
(http://www.persoonia.org/Issue/20/08.pdf).
These guidelines are currently also adopted by Blumea
(http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/nhn/blumea/2008/00000053/00000003
/art00001).
Peter Hovenkamp
Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Leiden branch
www.nationaalherbarium.nl
> -----Original Message-----
> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> [mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of
> Maarten Christenhusz
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 12:15 PM
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: [Taxacom] Citing taxonomical works (was: decline and
> fall oftaxonomy)
>
> Dear David and Taxacommers,
>
> Authors of biological articles should cite the works used by
> them in the material and methods part of their article. Other
> methods used previously are often cited, but the use of a
> taxonomic work with which they have identified their
> specimens is usually completely ignored.
> I ask all journal editors to change this in their policy -
> author guides, as well as citing species names properly.
>
> All electronic efforts in taxonomy are excellent and it is
> exactly what is needed to improve our science, but I agree
> also that there is little revenue for the authors: e.g.
> contributions to projects as EoL, ToL, GBIF etc do not bring
> any revenue for the author, nor will scratchpads. There is
> already the idea that knowledge is free and should be
> available to all, but who will compile and review this
> information? One cannot make an encyclopaedia without paying
> for the contents.
>
> Maarten
>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:04:28 -0500
> From: "Dr. David Campbell" <amblema at bama.ua.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] decline and fall of taxonomy
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Message-ID: <1245272668.4a395a5c4f507 at bamamail.ua.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> > A simple benefit would be (and this is of course not the sole
> > solution), if journals would demand proper citation for scientific
> > names, instead of inline citation with abbreviated authors
> as nowadays
> > usually is the case in botany.
>
> Perhaps a higher proportion of recent papers would get cited
> if there was some requirement to cite what reference was used
> to identify the species, rather than the original author.
> This might also highlight the need for taxonomists if the
> basis for the identification is not so good.
>
> --
> Dr. David Campbell
> 425 Scientific Collections Building
> Department of Biological Sciences
> Biodiversity and Systematics
> University of Alabama, Box 870345
> Tuscaloosa AL 35487-0345 USA
>
> Dr Maarten Christenhusz
> Flora Mesoamericana project
>
> Department of Botany
> The Natural History Museum
> Cromwell Road
> London SW7 5BD
> United Kingdom
>
> tel: [44] (0) 207 942 5108
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
>
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with
> either of these methods:
>
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
>
More information about the Taxacom
mailing list