[Taxacom] FW: formation of zoological names with Mc, Mac, et
jim.croft at gmail.com
Fri Sep 4 23:41:12 CDT 2009
Yes, this is quite a common practice and this is how I have always
In the case of 'Aphrotenia australiensis Hergstrom, in Cranston &
Edward, 1992', the name 'Aphrotenia australiensis' was proposed,
described and typified by Hergstrom in a
reference/publication/paper/monograph/etc. by Cranston & Edward, in
which Hergstrom could be considered a contributor, but not an author.
Cranston & Edward did not attribute the species authorship as such in
a act of grace and favour. Hergstrom did the work and Cranston &
Edward are including and quoting it. This is often done when a name
is needed in a hurry for a publication and the authors can not wait
for the magnum opus, and sometimes in acknowledgement and deference to
the intellectual contribution of the describing author.
I agree with Stephen's earlier comment that the 'author string'
(whatever you chose that to be) while not essential under the code, is
a useful indicator (based on prior knowledge) of how robust and
reliable a particular name or combination might be.
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Francisco
Welter-Schultes<fwelter at gwdg.de> wrote:
>> You can, as an author of a
>> publication, attribute a new name to anybody you like
> It is important who wrote the description. It is not enough to
> state "person X shall be author of this new name" but you must
> say "person X wrote the description alone and I am just quoting
> that text".
> University of Goettingen, Germany
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
> Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
Jim Croft ~ jim.croft at gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
... in pursuit of the meaning of leaf ...
... 'All is leaf' ('Alles ist Blatt') - Goethe
More information about the Taxacom