[Taxacom] Put a limit on number of submissions? Maybe, maybe not
releech at telus.net
Thu Sep 17 11:17:36 CDT 2009
You have it wrong, John. It is not that I agree or disagree with you,
it is that there is so much on the same issue that other things seem to
be bypassed. It is kinda like, "OK, nuff said on the issue."
But, it doesn't go away. It is there week after week.
Perhaps a chatroom for an issue, once it has had more than say 50
respondants, is in order. The active participants are not changing
their view. They are exchanging them, but when I have heard yours, say,
for the 4th or 5th time, I know where you are coming from, and same
with the others. It is overkill.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Grehan" <jgrehan at sciencebuff.org>
To: "Taxacom" <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 9:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Put a limit on number of submissions? Maybe,maybe not
>I agree with John Landolt's perspective although I would not respond
> just to the discussants off list as that defeats the purpose of the
> list. I am always amazed by the propensity of some people to want a list
> that either caters to their view on what should or should not be
> discussed, or on how much should be discussed. I suggest they set up
> their own lists and dictate accordingly. I have seen that done by some
> quite successfully. If you want to be censored according to someone
> else's personal preferences, or have the opportunity to censor the topic
> or amount of discussion then I say go for it.
> John Grehan
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [mailto:taxacom-
>> bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John Landolt
>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 10:54 AM
>> To: Robin Leech
>> Cc: Taxacom
>> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Put a limit on number of submissions?
>> Dear Robin and other Taxacomers:
>> As a listserv "lurker" (I haven't posted anything for quite a while)
>> I do find the frequent small group "discussions" and dialogs lead to
>> occasional delete key "cramping" but I also find some of the
>> exchanges can be edifying (and some days Taxacom traffic is all I get
>> in my inbox!).
>> I wonder if the problem lies in the ease with which one can click the
>> "reply to all" button compared to typing or copying just the address
>> (s) of the one or two people sharing one's "deep" interest in a
>> particular topic.
>> On balance, I'm willing to risk loss of edification through my too
>> quick use of the "delete" button rather than imposing an arbitrary
>> limit to postings. I do hope that this discussion gets everyone more
>> sensitive to a need to use the "reply to all" more judiciously. My
>> (less than) two cents.
>> Cheers to everyone.
>> John Landolt, Ph. D.
>> Research Professor of Biology, Emeritus
>> Graduate Faculty
>> Shepherd University
>> Shepherdstown, WV
>> On Sep 17, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Robin Leech wrote:
>> > For my two-bits worth, when I see 15 or more TAXACOM messages
>> > in my in box, and most are from 3 to 5 members, I no longer even
>> > bother to read them. I simply delete.
>> > Why don't these wordy guys write a book with all their rantings in
>> > then try to sell it?
>> > Robin
>> Taxacom Mailing List
>> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
>> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
>> these methods:
>> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
>> Or (2) a Google search specified as:
>> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
> these methods:
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:
> site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom