[Taxacom] globalnames?

Geoffrey Read gread at actrix.gen.nz
Thu Sep 17 21:29:28 CDT 2009

My commiserations on the collective mistake. Because the example was
important, and it failed on the essential point of being understandable
(else why bother).

Geoff (as fallible as any)

On Fri, September 18, 2009 11:02 am, Kevin Richards wrote:
> Yes, the 4th box had an error - graphics department slip up!
> But the example is not important, the mechanisms for going from "big bad
> world" -> GNI -> GNUB -> GNI -> back to "big bad world" was what we were
> trying to demonstrate!
> Kevin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Geoffrey Read [mailto:gread at actrix.gen.nz]
> Sent: Friday, 18 September 2009 11:02 a.m.
> To: Kevin Richards
> Cc: Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: RE: [Taxacom] globalnames?
> Well I'm sorry but now I'm back to still wondering if the poster pdf 4th
> box 'petalodes' names are poster author mistakes.  And even if intended
> it's a difficult example for the non-initiated to follow.

More information about the Taxacom mailing list