[Taxacom] Phylogenetic Game
Richard.Zander at mobot.org
Tue Dec 14 17:19:18 CST 2010
Ah, but just you wait, Paul. Soon a proposal will be introduced that renders as illegitimate all new names that make another taxon paraphyletic.
This would be a good test of the steel in the resolve of evolutionary taxonomists. Would you let this happen?
Richard H. Zander
Missouri Botanical Garden
PO Box 299
St. Louis, MO 63166 U.S.A.
richard.zander at mobot.org
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu on behalf of dipteryx at freeler.nl
Sent: Tue 12/14/2010 2:31 AM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Phylogenetic Game
Van: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu namens John Grehan
> A species name would seem to be paraphyletic if it is the same
> name applied to the entity that included the isolate that
> differentiated. If the larger range was given a new name then
> that would not be paraphyletic.
This is a novelty. I am familiar with names being unavailable,
illegitimate, incorrect, etc, but I have never heard of a name
being paraphyletic. I assume that this is according to the
International Code of Cladistic Nomenclature, or some such
Paul van Rijckevorsel
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
(1) http://taxacom.markmail.org <http://taxacom.markmail.org/>
Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom