[Taxacom] sloppy cladistic analyses
s.thorpe at auckland.ac.nz
Wed Feb 3 21:11:40 CST 2010
I think Grehan is talking about character weighting, in essence .. are you John, my friend?
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu [taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of John Grehan [jgrehan at sciencebuff.org]
Sent: Thursday, 4 February 2010 3:56 p.m.
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] sloppy cladistic analyses
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Jason Mate
"...'law of large numbers' that overrules the 'law of shared derived
characters'..." They are not laws, they are more like guidelines...
Seriously, the old quality versus quantity?
In a way yes. The 'law of large numbers' characterizes the perspectives
of many systematists, particularly molecularists, but also many
morphologists, that large numbers of characters somehow gives one more
likelihood of the right answer. I coined the 'law of shared derived
characters' a bit facetiously as a contrast in that its not a matter of
simply having a 'lot' of characters but having informative characters.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom