[Taxacom] e-only taxonomic publication is safe & accessible
s.thorpe at auckland.ac.nz
Wed Feb 10 17:46:36 CST 2010
67.2.1. In the meaning of the Code the "originally included nominal species" comprise only those included in the newly established nominal genus or subgenus, having been cited in the original publication by an available name (including citation by an incorrect spelling [Art. 67.6]) of a species or subspecies (see Articles 45.6 and 68.2), or having been cited there as the deliberate application of a previous misidentification (see Articles 11.10, 67.13 and 69.2.4).
On second thoughts the new generic names are unavailable also (see the above caveat about originally included nominal species must be cited by an AVAILABLE name). Though, had one of the new genera included an already named species, then this would have been type species ...
From: Christopher Taylor [gerarus at westnet.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 11 February 2010 11:38 a.m.
To: Stephen Thorpe; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: RE: [Taxacom] e-only taxonomic publication is safe & accessible
> As an aside, I would be very interested in any "high-profile" names you
> are aware of that weren't published on paper ...
_Science_ and other high-impact, low-pagespace journals have been guilty on
more than one occasion of banishing the descriptions of new taxa to the
online-only supplementary info. One recent example was the description by
Ren _et al._ (2009) of a number of fossil mecopteroids:
Ren, D., C. C. Labandeira, J. A. Santiago-Blay, A. Rasnitsyn, C.-K. Shih, A.
Bashkuev, M. A. V. Logan, C. L. Hotton & D. Dilcher. 2009. A probable
pollination mode before angiosperms: Eurasian, long-proboscid scorpionflies.
_Science_ 326: 840-847.
The names of the new taxa appear in the paper-published article, but the
details necessary to make them more than _nomina nuda_ (such as holotype
designation) do not.
Dept of Environmental Biology
Curtin University of Technology
GPO Box U1987
More information about the Taxacom