[Taxacom] data quality vs. data security: a survey
deepreef at bishopmuseum.org
Sat Feb 13 17:11:58 CST 2010
I have to say I'm having a little bit of difficulty reconciling this
> it doesn't at all
> imply any sort of subjectivity of opinion. At least one of us
> is wrong in our ideas about this!
....with the premise that what we are discussing is "maximum benefit to the
Isn't it somewhat subjective what constitutes a benefit? Don't all tasks
come with some cost and some benefit, and the relative balance between them
is at least *somewhat* influenced my subjective matters?
> A related issue which I find "very odd" is giving unique
> identifiers to taxon names, when taxon names are already
> unique identifers for taxa (and when that does go astray due
> to homonymy, it is easily fixed by replacement name).
I WISH I had the time to dissect this ... but I don't, so I won't. If
nobody else does, I may give it a shot later.
> Though "pointless" is a value judgement relative to one's
> values (different values may include (1) furtherance of human
> knowledge, or (2) economic prosperity, in varying
> proportions). Do you and I have different values, Richard?
More information about the Taxacom