[Taxacom] bioinformatics ignored: a disappointing case of homonymy in 2010
jim.croft at gmail.com
Sun Feb 21 02:02:47 CST 2010
we also have this:
"Disclaimer for Scientific, Technical and Social Science Publications
Taylor & Francis make every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in its publications. However,
Taylor & Francis and its agents and licensors make no representations
or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness or
suitability for any purpose of the Content and disclaim all such
representations and warranties whether express or implied to the
maximum extent permitted by law. Any views expressed in this
publication are the views of the authors and are not the views of
Taylor & Francis."
so everything's cool...
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Stephen Thorpe <s.thorpe at auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> despite the Diptera being very well covered by existing bioinformatics databases, we have this:
> the journal website (http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/NAQI ) says:
> 'All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees'
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
> Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
Jim Croft ~ jim.croft at gmail.com ~ +61-2-62509499 ~
'A civilized society is one which tolerates eccentricity to the point
of doubtful sanity.'
- Robert Frost, poet (1874-1963)
More information about the Taxacom