[Taxacom] New synapomorphy for humans and orangutans
kfitzhug at nhm.org
Sat Jan 2 20:17:03 CST 2010
Kinman wrote: "Declaring it a synapomorphy is at best premature."
Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem. It's not advocated in science for nothing.
J. Kirk Fitzhugh, Ph.D.
Curator of Polychaetes
Invertebrate Zoology Section
Research & Collections Branch
Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County
900 Exposition Blvd Los Angeles CA 90007
e-mail: kfitzhug at nhm.org
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu on behalf of Kenneth Kinman
Sent: Sat 1/2/2010 6:11 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] New synapomorphy for humans and orangutans
It's deja vu all over again. But now all you need to do is to
find a genome change which backs it up (or any of your other proposed
synapomorphies). Otherwise, it's most likely just what the authors
suggested it is---homoplastic, not synapomorphic.
P.S. It would be interesting to know if bonobo chimps have a later
eruption of molars than regular chimps. Wouldn't be at all surprised if
bonobos erupt closer to 4.6 years than regular chimps at 4.0 years.
With so little sampling, I wouldn't read too much into this character
anyway. Declaring it a synapomorphy is at best premature.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom