[Taxacom] New synapomorphy for humans and orangutans
jgrehan at sciencebuff.org
Sat Jan 2 21:21:47 CST 2010
I agree completely with Ken's caveat about the lack of sampling. It's a
wonder that the authors were allowed to make their comparisons based on
so few samples. I would say that its an apparent synapomorphy and it
will be interesting to see if it is validated or falsified by subsequent
The 'genome backup' is just a red hearing. Even if the same
developmental pathways and same DNA changes were found to be involved it
could still just be dismissed as a parallelism.
From: taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
[mailto:taxacom-bounces at mailman.nhm.ku.edu] On Behalf Of Kenneth Kinman
Sent: Saturday, January 02, 2010 9:11 PM
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Subject: [Taxacom] New synapomorphy for humans and orangutans
It's deja vu all over again. But now all you need to do is to
find a genome change which backs it up (or any of your other proposed
synapomorphies). Otherwise, it's most likely just what the authors
suggested it is---homoplastic, not synapomorphic.
P.S. It would be interesting to know if bonobo chimps have a later
eruption of molars than regular chimps. Wouldn't be at all surprised if
bonobos erupt closer to 4.6 years than regular chimps at 4.0 years.
With so little sampling, I wouldn't read too much into this character
anyway. Declaring it a synapomorphy is at best premature.
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of
Or (2) a Google search specified as:
site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom