[Taxacom] Hygrobia (was Eurasia-Australian distribution)

Jason Mate jfmate at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 25 16:31:37 CDT 2010






I have no idea what is behind their distribution: that is why it is so interesting (if you care for water beetles that is). 

The chinese Hygrobia appears indeed to have disappeared from its former 
haunt. However I would loath to claim it is extinct. I know of 2 
coleopteran species that were apparently extinct but have surfaced 
recently. Most of the old collecting localities in China are been built 
over but these were coastal localities so the extinction pattern is very
 much stacked against coastal habitats.

Of the australian 
Hygrobia I know australiasiae is common; nigra has a wide range; watsi 
is endangered. The latter lives in bogs in W Australia, not very good 
real state in that heck of the woods!


In any case, Aspidytidae and Amphizoidae are either extremely
poorly known and sampled, or extremely relictual.  Aspidytidae in
particular, having been only been recognized since 2002, may be found in
far more localities in Africa and Asia in the future, so their seemingly
"curious" distribution may not appear so curious in the future.         
     I'm not sure whether or not all of this will affect my hypothesis
that Dytiscidae has outcompeted Hygrobiidae (or other families in the
superfamily), thus forcing them into relictual (and relatively
specialized) distributions and life-styles.  Aspydites too has a bizarre distribution (two species one in China and the other in South Africa). However they are fairly specialised (hygropetric flows), an infrequently sampled habitat so other species may have been overlooked. The ZA species was collected from an upwelling by the road during the dry season (pers. comm.) and it wasn´t rare. But when another collector went during the winter  (lots of water everywhere) he couldn´t find a single one. The chinese species is from a waterfall and I believe it is only known from the type locality. Another good example is Meruidae from  Venezuela (El Tobogán) and all the Myxophagans that are turning up in South America, all from hygropetric habitats.

Amphizoidae (and Psephenidae) though are not very mysterious. Their distribution (NA, Japan, China) is a pattern that is endlessly repeated with many other taxa.

The even bigger question is
perhaps whether the common ancestor of these four families lived in
rivers or ponds.  

Hygrobia´s alternate stroke pattern is "primitive" i.e. not very good at swimming. I think it is more likely that it was the first attempt a hydradephaga
so ponds and puddles are most likely

In any case, that common ancestor most likely lived in
Eurasia, which would suggest that Hygrobia evolved there and then
invaded Australia, not vice versa.  Either way, one can't help but
wonder if Hygrobiids may still exist in places like New Guinea, waiting
to be discovered.   
H. watsi´s location in bogs in W Australia makes me think that Hygrobia is Gondwanan. But it is just a guess. PNG would be a good candidate to look for other Hygrobias, considering the shared history. Still M- Balke has been collecting there several times and hasn´t come accross any: the mystery deepens!

Best


Jason

> From: kennethkinman at webtv.net
> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 13:18:20 -0500
> To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: [Taxacom] Hygrobia (was Eurasia-Australian distribution)
> 
> Hi Jason,
>        So, do you think the distribution might more likely be the result
> of an association of Hygrobia with a particular kind of plant?  I read
> that Hygrobia uniquely (among adephagans) contains a couple of acidic
> compounds, so perhaps it depends on a plant to supply those compounds
> (or their chemical precursors).  Leopoldo noted the Damasonium
> distribution, but I'm not sure its distribution is quite close enough to
> be suggestive of a strong association (although both apparently like
> acidic ponds).
>           ------Ken
> P.S. Are the species of Hygrobia in Australia common where they occur?
> The Chinese species apparently is not, and might even now be extinct.
>    
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> Taxacom Mailing List
> Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> http://mailman.nhm.ku.edu/mailman/listinfo/taxacom
> 
> The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
> 
> (1) http://taxacom.markmail.org
> 
> Or (2) a Google search specified as:  site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom  your search terms here
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969


More information about the Taxacom mailing list