[Taxacom] Objective synonyms?
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sat May 29 04:06:08 CDT 2010
> I may suggest you read up on the basics? [May I suggest you read up on the basics?]
May I suggest that you read a little beyond the basics! :)
From: "dipteryx at freeler.nl" <dipteryx at freeler.nl>
To: taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Sent: Sat, 29 May, 2010 8:28:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Objective synonyms?
Van: Stephen Thorpe [mailto:stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz]
Verzonden: za 29-5-2010 10:04
> Real example: the name vulgaris, as used in the combination
> Vespula vulgaris is NOT an objective synonym of the name
> vulgaris as used in the combination Panorpa vulgaris.
Neither "vulgaris" is "a name[...] of the same rank used
to denote [a] taxonomic taxon." It cannot be a synonym
(in the sense of the ICZN), by definition.
Instead, "vulgaris" is a specific name (or in a wider sense
a species-group name). It is not a scientific name for a
taxon, in any rank, but can be a part of one or more names
at the rank of species or subspecies.
I may suggest you read up on the basics?
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these methods:
Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom