[Taxacom] ICZN procedure question
fwelter at gwdg.de
Thu Nov 11 16:49:39 CST 2010
Sorry Doug, you are right, I referred to the earlier issue, where
there were six comments.
The principal concern of most critical voices has less been the peer
review problem and the quality of publications, but the long-term
sustainability of electronic information. In medecine they don't
need to read the original information in 250 years, that's the
difference to us.
In BHL we are working hard in trying to develop systems to make
electronic files more sustainable, but it is less a technical but
rather a sociopolitical problem. Who is going to pay for
maintaining electronic libraries? However, the first step is to
develop such a library, that's what we are currently doing. Only
then we can get realistic ideas of the costs for maintaining it, and
then maybe the public gets convinced of how useful it would be to pay
for all that continuously, for several such libraries in several
countries. That would be great.
I also have a problem with most (or at least 50 % of the)
Commissioners not communicating to an extent which in a democratic
environment would be regarded as usual for persons whose job is to
pass laws. The Commissioners cannot "hide" themselves behind
political parties who would take care for the communication.
Since there is certainly no "consensus" in the community (this term
was used in the initial proposal in 2008), as can be seen in the
published comments, it is an exciting situation and there is always
the question, what will happen if the Commission takes a decision
disregarding this situation in the community. I would certainly opt
for taking some measures afterwards, but I do not really like to
think about that at the current moment.
University of Goettingen, Germany
More information about the Taxacom