[Taxacom] The digital horizon
stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Sat Nov 13 20:56:34 CST 2010
well, my work on Wikispecies at least points the user to the existence of
specific non-digitised literature ... in the old days they would have to go to
the library even to do that ...
From: Bob Mesibov <mesibov at southcom.com.au>
To: kim at kimvdlinde.com
Cc: TAXACOM <taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu>
Sent: Sun, 14 November, 2010 3:41:13 PM
Subject: [Taxacom] The digital horizon
Kim van der Linde wrote:
"The aspect that could make it really expensive is digitalization of old stuff
because that is just a huge number of man hours to do the manual work of making
the page scans."
Digression: interesting that there's only been a limited amount of crowdsourcing
on this. Zillions of homemade, high-quality ripoffs of commercial films and TV
shows have been uploaded to YouTube, but is there a scientific literature
project dedicated to getting fed by volunteer home scanners?
At least in taxonomy there's community support for getting all the old
literature digitised and online, because taxonomists value that old stuff
highly. This isn't the case for the much vaster literature dealing with
non-taxonomic observations. As a result, there's now a very sharp and obvious
digital horizon in what might be called 'general biology'. If it ain't online,
it don't exist.
Imagine an ecology student in 1970. She makes some interesting observations on a
local genus of spiders and then wants to see (a) whether anyone else has
reported this, and (b) whether other species in the same genus do the same
thing. She goes to the university library and starts tracking back through
Zoological Record and Biological Abstracts and CAB and other indexes. Sure
enough, there are papers she needs to check, scattered through a dozen journals
and minor publications going back 120 years. With the help of Interlibrary Loan
and friendly librarians, she tracks these sources down and takes notes or
photocopies (?anachronism? not sure). A lot of the stuff isn't helpful, but some
is, and the result is great background for her own work.
Imagine such a student in 2010. She doesn't go to the library because she
doesn't have to, the online resources are available at her workstation, or on
her laptop as she sits somewhere in the university's wireless footprint. The
Biodiversity Heritage Library and archive.org help, but a lot of published
material is beyond the digital horizon. Neither the student nor her supervisor
see it as worth her while to visit libraries chasing old paper sources. It's not
worth the effort.
Some people see this as a librarian's problem, but I see it as a tragedy for
biologists generally. Unless and until we can drag *all* the old publications,
not just taxonomic ones, over the digital horizon and into our world, we've lost
maybe 150 years of good scientific observations.
Dr Robert Mesibov
Honorary Research Associate
Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, and
School of Zoology, University of Tasmania
Home contact: PO Box 101, Penguin, Tasmania, Australia 7316
Ph: (03) 64371195; 61 3 64371195
Taxacom Mailing List
Taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
The Taxacom archive going back to 1992 may be searched with either of these
Or (2) a Google search specified as: site:mailman.nhm.ku.edu/pipermail/taxacom
your search terms here
More information about the Taxacom