[Taxacom] taxacom NZ Inventory
gread at actrix.gen.nz
Wed Nov 17 19:06:59 CST 2010
I'm curious. What taxa do you think you have better taxonomic knowledge of
than all your peers, thus those where you would expect others to mostly
leave the compilation of info (print checklist, online facility, or
whatever) to you, and what proportion did those groups occupy in the 2003
list, or indeed do they occupy in the forthcoming Coleoptera list in the
unpublished NZ Inventory book vol 2?
Also, are there any NZ/world groups in which you have an interest where,
in conjunction with another professional entomologist with overlapping
interests, you might see yourself exchanging views, and producing a
collaborative paper that would be better than either's solo effort?
On Thu, November 18, 2010 9:30 am, Stephen Thorpe wrote:
> It is WAY more complicated than that! I was not originally invited to
> to that checklist, but I happened to see a late proof, and let's just say
> that I
> managed to convince the authors that it would be somewhat imprudent of
> them to
> publish without significant revisions that I offered to freely make, for
> sake of the quality of the end product.
More information about the Taxacom