[Taxacom] Catalogue of Life, EoL, etc.

Stephen Thorpe stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz
Tue Sep 28 21:43:23 CDT 2010


Curiously, the Tabanidae reference isn't the only stuff-up on that Diptera names 
record used as the data source for CoL, etc! They also cite the wrong subgenus 
of Culex - even in the title of the reference!! The correct details, with a PDF 
link to the original reference, can be seen here:
http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Culex_jalisco
... more scrutiny required ...
Stephen



________________________________
From: "Tony.Rees at csiro.au" <Tony.Rees at csiro.au>
To: neale at bishopmuseum.org
Cc: stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
Sent: Wed, 29 September, 2010 3:04:57 PM
Subject: RE: [Taxacom] Catalogue of Life, EoL, etc.

Dear Neal,

My apologies for casting aspersions, they were intended only to be 
instructional, but actually I did check before typing that line, of course...

http://130.225.211.25/diptera/names/FMPro?-db=names.fp5&-format=nomenclatordetail.html&-lay=www%20detail&-sortfield=unsorted&Name=Culex%20jalisco&-max=10&-recid=12683823&-find=


gives family Tabanidae for that species (Culex jalisco Berlin, 1974), while 
others are correctly in Culicidae - sorry.

Or maybe that is an old record somehow, but it still tallies with what is in CoL 
2010 online version...

Regards - Tony


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neal Evenhuis [mailto:neale at bishopmuseum.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, 29 September 2010 11:29 AM
> To: Rees, Tony (CMAR, Hobart)
> Cc: stephen_thorpe at yahoo.co.nz; taxacom at mailman.nhm.ku.edu
> Subject: Re: [Taxacom] Catalogue of Life, EoL, etc.
> 
> At 3:20 PM -1000 9/28/10, Tony.Rees at csiro.au wrote:
> >Hi Stephen,
> >
> >If you understand the data flow you will realise where the error
> >originates, i.e. EoL uses that Cat. of Life for its taxonomic
> >authority file / data backbone, CoL is a compilation of numerous
> >(70+) specialist contributors, so errors in any of the latter will
> >be propagated up the chain unless someone spots them (as you have
> >done) - then the appropriate action is to inform the source database
> >(in this case the BioSystematic Database of World Diptera,
> >http://www.diptera.org/ ) who will no doubt be pleased to be alerted
> >to it so that it can be corrected.
> 
> Well ... it sure didn't come from there. See search results for Culex
> from that database. Check before you cast blame someplace....
> 
> http://bit.ly/dnfTZg
> 
> Next guess????
> 
> -Neal



      


More information about the Taxacom mailing list